- From: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 00:43:51 +0200
- To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
- cc: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
On 27.10.00 at 14:25, Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com> wrote: >I suggest adding a "parent element" selector for fragments, or perhaps >logic that would contextualize the root node of the fragment submitted for >validation. I think this would work as long as the fragments were at least >reasonably well-formed. For instance, if you wanted to validate, say, >just a table that would ultimately be nested within another, you might >select TD/TH from a select/option element, submit your fragment, and the >validator would synthesize a complete document for validation, with your >fragment as the child of a TD/TH element in an otherwise valid document. While I think that's an excellent idea, it's consequences for the implementation are too far reaching. Implementing it would require a "right thorough buggering"[0] of the existing code base, and development resources that just aren't available at the present time (patches, however, are always very welcomed!). Even given that I could figure out some sane way of implementing it, it'd take far too much time that could be better spent on other, less esoteric, features. I'll keep it in mind though. A minimal (i.e. "stupid") implementation that wraps your fragment in a suitable BODY element -- possibly with different DOCTYPEs selectable -- should be possible; at least after some other cleanups have landed. [0] - My current favourite phrase. I'm reading _way_ too many British authors these days. :-) -- As a cat owner, I know this for a fact... Nothing says "I love you" like a decapitated gopher on your front porch.
Received on Friday, 27 October 2000 19:44:24 UTC