- From: Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 02:16:17 -0400
- To: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 02:25:14PM -0700, Todd Fahrner wrote: > Individual authors often write complete HTML documents, but > organizations tend to write fragments of HTML documents, which > eventually get concatenated into complete documents. It is currently > cumbersome to validate document fragments; it involves making up a > minimal template representing the ancestry of the fragment. One hack you might be able to use to get around this is: <!DOCTYPE table PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <table><tr><td></td></tr></table> > I suggest adding a "parent element" selector for fragments, or > perhaps logic that would contextualize the root node of the fragment > submitted for validation. I think this would work as long as the > fragments were at least reasonably well-formed. For instance, if you > wanted to validate, say, just a table that would ultimately be nested > within another, you might select TD/TH from a select/option element, > submit your fragment, and the validator would synthesize a complete > document for validation, with your fragment as the child of a TD/TH > element in an otherwise valid document. Alternatively, the validator > might guess that because the root of your fragment is LI, its parent > must be OL/UL, and synthesize an appropriate template. I don't think this kind of publishing model is widespread enough to justify adding a feature like this to the validator. I would think that any publisher with this kind of system in place would have the resources available to add validation at the appropriate step(s) of the publishing process. -- Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org> +1 613 261 6630 System Administrator http://www.w3.org/People/Gerald/ World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
Received on Saturday, 28 October 2000 02:16:22 UTC