- From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 14:40:57 +0200
- To: "Christian Smith" <csmith@smith-family.com>, <www-validator@w3.org>
- Cc: "Bertilo Wennergren" <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
Christian Smith:
> > Well, they are well-formed (I believe). The second one should be
> > valid too, although it's hard to be sure, since there are no
> > validators to check them with.
> Manually check the file against the XHTML DTD. You'll see that the FORM
> element takes form.content as it content.
Oh, oh. Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa!
I'm glad some of this nonsense is my own doing. A least when it's my head
that is broken I can start doing something about it.
As it turns out now, both the WDG HTML Validator and the validator at
XHTML Validator 0.9 are OK, so I can very happily retract a lot of what
I've said on this matter.
But the W3C validator is still talking nonsense.
Thank's for all the reactions. When I asked about this before there
was just a thundering silence.
#####################################################################
Bertilo Wennergren
<http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
<bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
#####################################################################
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 08:41:46 UTC