- From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:53:31 +0200
- To: <JAMESICUS@aol.com>, <www-validator@w3.org>
James Pickering:
> http://www.concinnity.se/bertilow/div/mad.html
> http://www.concinnity.se/bertilow/div/testform.htm
> [...]
> What really surprised me was that both of your files passed muster
> ("Congratulations" , etc.) when I ran them in XML.com's RUWF
> (are you well formed) XML Syntax Checker:
Well, they are well-formed (I believe). The second one should be
valid too, although it's hard to be sure, since there are no
validators to check them with.
#####################################################################
Bertilo Wennergren
<http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
<bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
#####################################################################
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 07:54:12 UTC