- From: Sean Palmer <wapdesign@wapdesign.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 17:11:38 +0100
- To: "Terje Bless" <link@tss.no>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
> No. It points out that it barfs on a page you say is probably invalid > anyway and passes on two pages you say are supposed to pass. I'm fully > aware that I'm missing something here, but I have no clue what that is. :-| Nothing is missing! The W3C validator only validates XML, not XML Schemas (yet). > As I said, I have no idea why Gerald doesn't use that "Valid XML" image > that he's got sitting around. I'm sure there's something... (feel free to > jump in any time here, Gerald! ;D). Yes: maybe he's busy. I emailed him directly and he asked me to post it to this list!!! > This would imply directly groking XML Schemas, no? Exactly > >cf http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/extxhtml/, http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/exp/ > > Yes, those both validate. Shouldn't they? > > Am I missing something really obvious here? Everyone off sniggering at me? *snigger* you're not meant to validate them, you're supposed to read them for more information! They will inform you a bit about XML Schemas and XHTML Families (I hope). Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer WAP Tech Info - http://www.waptechinfo.com/
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2000 12:13:26 UTC