- From: Sean Palmer <wapdesign@wapdesign.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 14:20:23 +0100
- To: "Terje Bless" <link@tss.no>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
> >Nothing! The URI I gave was just an example. Actually, > >I don't think it was Schema valid, but it was XML valid. > >Try http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/utilcomment.html instead. > > That's a dump of Dan's original page. Unlike your provided example, this > page validates. Is that in any way significant? Well, yes; it points out that the validator doesn't validate the Schema. > >Anyway, can we have a logo for XML valid documents? > > I may have misunderstood what you wanted. Are you simply asking for a > "Valid XML 1.0" badge? Or does this have something to do with the > "comment" Schema? If it's the former, Gerald will have to answer -- see > http://validator.w3.org/images/vxml10.gif *shrug* dunno why it's not > being used! -- if it's the latter then I'm not getting it, could you > explain a little more? Read the original message more carefully. I'm just asking for:- The XML logo to be displayed when we validate our XML pages Some cross over between the validator and XSV and this:- What exactly is the status of the Validator at w3.org - will you be able to validate XHTML Families on it once modularization come into effect? This is a big problem you guys are going to have to tackle! cf http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/extxhtml/, http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/exp/ Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer President and Founder WAP Tech Info - http://www.waptechinfo.com/
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2000 09:23:03 UTC