- From: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 01:00:03 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- CC: Sean Palmer <wapdesign@wapdesign.org.uk>
Sean Palmer wrote: > >>What's wrong with >> >><URL:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/ >>04schema-hacking/comment-test.html>? > >Nothing! The URI I gave was just an example. Actually, >I don't think it was Schema valid, but it was XML valid. >Try http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/utilcomment.html instead. That's a dump of Dan's original page. Unlike your provided example, this page validates. Is that in any way significant? >Anyway, can we have a logo for XML valid documents? I may have misunderstood what you wanted. Are you simply asking for a "Valid XML 1.0" badge? Or does this have something to do with the "comment" Schema? If it's the former, Gerald will have to answer -- see http://validator.w3.org/images/vxml10.gif *shrug* dunno why it's not being used! -- if it's the latter then I'm not getting it, could you explain a little more?
Received on Monday, 28 August 2000 19:00:10 UTC