- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:15:22 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5992 --- Comment #6 from Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> 2009-03-22 22:15:21 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I think problems like this are going to be never ending, therefore I think the > W3C should use the validator.nu as for the "front end" of its validation > service. Has this been considered before? This is getting a little OT and would probably be best on the validator list, but yes, this has been considered. The validator.nu engine is a wonderful piece of software, in many ways superior to the other engines which validator.w3.org uses. However, IMHO validator.nu is neither stable enough (see e.g http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2009Mar/0037.html ) nor flexible enough (limited number of profiles, no DTD support for legacy HTML, etc) nor usable enough (bare bone UI and limited message explanations, no file upload, no direct input, etc) to simply "be" the sole and front engine on validator.w3.org. I am quite certain that at this point, having validator.w3.org be a frontend for multiple engines, including OpenSP for DTD and validator.nu for html5 and other applications, is the most desirable architecture. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 22 March 2009 22:15:30 UTC