- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:25:54 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6298 --- Comment #9 from Damien B <kame@cinemasie.com> 2009-01-14 14:25:54 --- > I should have backed up what I said. :) > > > > http://www.ask.com/web?q=xhtml5 Showing 1-10 of 12,700 > > http://www.ask.com/web?q=xhtml1 Showing 1-10 of 533,000 > > And what does this prove? If you look closely you'll see that the term "XHTML5" has virtually no existence outside of the WhatWG circle. Proposing "HTML 5 (HTML5 syntax)" and "HTML 5 (XML syntax)" is clearer, fully in accordance with the Draft, less misleading regarding XHTML and won't prevent the few people really accustomed to "XHTML5" from using the validator. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 14:26:04 UTC