[Bug 6298] Provide a parser override


--- Comment #8 from Dean Edridge <dean@dean.org.nz>  2009-01-14 13:12:56 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > It *is* widely used on the web, I know this because I have had Google alerts
> > for XHTML5 for the last 3 1/2 years. XHTML5 has also been mentioned in books,
> > magazines and on the BBC's web site. 
> I should have backed up what I said. :)
> http://www.ask.com/web?q=xhtml5 Showing 1-10 of 12,700
> http://www.ask.com/web?q=xhtml1 Showing 1-10 of 533,000

And what does this prove?

> I'm following also the discussions on different alerts ;)
> The proposal of Mike is reasonable

Karl, I have just explained that using "XML" instead of "XHTML" is problematic.
Only "XHTML" can distinguish between HTML5 and XHTML5 as it is possible to use
XML syntax in HTML5 text/html web pages.

I'm sure Mike's just trying to be nice and keep the peace, but it is not a good

> and there are still a few issues to solve
> in terms of community and agreements.

So what? We can't let silly politics hold back the progress of the web and the
validation of XHTML web sites Karl.

> See http://intertwingly.net/blog/2008/12/15/Co-Chair-HTML-WG and the comments.

Yeah, I've already seen that, so what? Sam's heading in the wrong direction and
this has been pointed out on his blog and on www-html.

> (btw I have no preferences over a term. I just pointed out that there are still
> two voices.)


Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 13:13:07 UTC