- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:50:45 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6301 --- Comment #6 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> 2009-01-05 14:50:45 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I've just noticed that the HEAD version is validating doctypeless text/html > pages as valid HTML5 [1][2], It says it does but if you try out new elements or something invalid you'll see that it really doesn't. > (these pages should be treated the same as > doctypeless XHTML pages were treated prior to (X)HTML5). (Why?) > It is *only* pages > served as application/xhtml+xml or application/xml that can omit the doctype. > For a page to be valid HTML5 or XHTML5 it must either have a doctype like: > "<!DOCTYPE html>" or have no doctype at all and be served as > application/xhtml+xml or application/xml (I'm waiting to here back from Henri > regarding how we should deal with doctypeless text/xml as it's not a valid > XHTML5 mime type). No, XHTML5 may have any XML MIME type and any (or no) doctype. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/infrastructure.html#authors-using-xhtml -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 January 2009 14:50:54 UTC