- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:40:05 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6301 --- Comment #5 from Dean Edridge <dean@dean.org.nz> 2009-01-05 14:40:05 --- (In reply to comment #4) > This seems to be working now on HEAD, although it still whines about lack of > doctype and claims to be going to validate as XHTML 1.0 Transitional. > I've just noticed that the HEAD version is validating doctypeless text/html pages as valid HTML5 [1][2], (these pages should be treated the same as doctypeless XHTML pages were treated prior to (X)HTML5). It is *only* pages served as application/xhtml+xml or application/xml that can omit the doctype. For a page to be valid HTML5 or XHTML5 it must either have a doctype like: "<!DOCTYPE html>" or have no doctype at all and be served as application/xhtml+xml or application/xml (I'm waiting to here back from Henri regarding how we should deal with doctypeless text/xml as it's not a valid XHTML5 mime type). [1] http://dean.org.nz/temp/no-doctype/ (text/html) [2] http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdean.org.nz%2Ftemp%2Fno-doctype%2F&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&ss=1&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.630 -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 January 2009 14:40:20 UTC