- From: Martin Šošić <martin@loopus.co>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:32:12 +0100
- To: www-validator-css@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANhg7xR9uxwbCXbA7TfjVCDRQr2qX7MVmP0OkDYDQ3ZBjQriiA@mail.gmail.com>
I tried validating my css using both validators and they give different results! http://www.css-validator.org/returns much more errors (245 in my case) than http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ (which returned 24 errors). What is the difference between these to? Aren't they both under w3c? Options I used for http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/: - Profile: CSS level 3 - Medium: all - Warnings: all - Vendor extensions: default I also tried changing Vendor extensions value, if I set it to Errors I get about 100 errors, if I set it to warnings I get same amount of errors as when default, which is 24. Options I used for http://www.css-validator.org/: - Profile: CSS level 3 - Medium: all - Warnings: all Examples of errors not returned by css-validator but not by jigsaw: - ".kill-flicker: Property backface-visibility doesn't exist : hidden hidden" Line no: "5" - ": Unknown pseudo-element or pseudo-class ::-moz-focus-inner [-moz-focus-inner]" Line no: "225" Thank you, Martin
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2014 21:07:01 UTC