- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:29:40 +0200
- To: joerg.simanowski@uni-rostock.de
- CC: www-validator-css@w3.org
2012-03-20 13:52, joerg.simanowski@uni-rostock.de wrote: > it seems, that the validator shows the following bug: > http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://www.ub.uni-rostock.de/ub/index_xde.shtml&warning=no&profile=css2 > <http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://www.ub.uni-rostock.de/ub/index_xde.shtml&warning=no&profile=css2> > "Ungültige Nummer : font-weight > <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.html#propdef-font-weight> 300 ist > kein font-weight-Wert : 300" > but i think 300 is a valid value in the css-definition: > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.html#propdef-font-weight Yes, this is a bug, discovered at least a few days ago: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-css/2012Mar/0015.html Yucca
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 12:30:17 UTC