- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:57:05 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- cc: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>, "www-validator-css@w3.org" <www-validator-css@w3.org>
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: > Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > >> What is the rationale for issuing the warning "Same colors for color and >> background-color in two contexts"? It seems that the warning is always >> issued, with default settings, when one rule assigns the same value to >> background-color as one rule assigns to color, e.g. > >> a { color: black; } >> b { background: black; } > > Well. Isn't it simply the case that we are discussing > CSS, rather than CSS embedded in HTML, and therefore > the CSS validator can have no knowledge as to whether > an <a> element will be embedded in a <b> element, and > therefore seeks to warn the user that such a usage > would be ill-advised ? Yes, it's a "be aware that unwanted things might happen" warning, you can see in the advanced interface that there is a selection of "all", "normal" ,"most important" warnings. The choice might be clearer, or the warning might output its severity in the report... -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiƩu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 15:57:10 UTC