- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 05:50:14 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jordan Clark <clarky_y2k@hotmail.com>
- cc: www-validator-css@w3.org
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Jordan Clark wrote: > To the CSS Validator team: > > What has happened to the new option that you recently added, which > allowed us to display vendor extensions as warnings (as opposed to > errors)? > > I really do hope that you have just taken it down temporarily, rather > than permanently removing the option. In fact, it happened when a new translation was added and the translated indexes regenerated. It didn't disappear from the code but only from the main validator page, fixed now. Thank you for reporting it! BR > In my humble opinion, the possibility of being able to class CSS vendor > extensions as warnings is *A Good Thing*: Many ? myself included ? do > not want to use CSS properties that do not validate. As you probably > know, some websites, such as government organisations, are actually > *bound* use to valid code. Therefore, by removing this option, you are > effectively discouraging a large number of designers/developers from > pushing the boundaries and using the new features and functionality that > CSS3 provides. > > Just my two cents, as they say. > > Regards, > > Jordan Clark > http://profile.jdclark.org > > (P.S. If you *have* only took this feature down for some behind-the-scenes fine-tuning, please accept my apology for this little rant!) > > -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Received on Monday, 11 April 2011 09:50:16 UTC