- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:21:07 +0300
- To: <zoffix@zoffix.com>, <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Zoffix Znet wrote: > If you validate http://stevensfuneralsupplies.com/ you'll see two > errors for the print.css file: > ( http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F% > 2Fstevensfuneralsupplies.com%2F&warning=2&profile=css3&usermedium=all > ) > > Value Error : content none is not a content value : none > > The CSS2.1 Specification lists 'none' as a valid value for `content` > property: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html#propdef-content But you have requested for "validation" against "CSS3" (which is a collection of sketchy drafts that may change at any moment and should not be cited except as work in progress). That's what the parameter profile=css3 means. The really funny thing is that the newest draft labeled as belonging to the "CSS3" family lists the value none as permitted for the property content: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/#inserting3 So as far as there can be a bug in a program that checks against something in draft status, here you have one. > a[href^="mailto:"]:after { content: none; } I wonder whether content: none could be replaced by content: "", but that's a different issue. It would matter, though, if your pointy-haired boss or teacher requires you to present a "clean validation report". :-) > And if validated by "Direct Input" does not produce validator errors. This, too, depends on the version ("profile") of CSS you "validate" against. The default is "CSS 2.1". -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Saturday, 6 June 2009 08:23:35 UTC