- From: Paul McKeown (Tiscali) <ppjmckeown@tiscali.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:17:48 +0000
- To: www-validator-css@w3.org
- CC: doug@perreault.us, ot@w3.org
Olivier, Douglas, I am pleased to see that you agree with my observation of what is required by the specifications. However, I cannot agree with your wish that the warning should remain. The issue is quite simple. The specification requires an explicit width for CSS 2.0; the specification does not require an explicit width for CSS 2.1. It is clear that the authors of the CSS 2.1 specification quite deliberately omitted the requirement for an explicit width. It is simply wrong to generate a warning for using CSS 2.1 correctly. I take warnings justs as seriously as errors and correct them as soon as I discover them; in this case, however, it is the validator which is at fault, not my css. So I have no intention of correcting css to accomodate the validator's incorrect validation algorithm. If this validator fault was left uncorrected, I would be forced to look elsewhere for a correct validator. I know of no current browser with which this seems to give a problem - and I test more extensively than most authors that I know of, with basic testing ensuring that the pages work on Trident from IE 4.0 through to IE 8.0, Gecko from Firefox 2.0, the most recent version of Firefox 3.0, KHTML with the most recent version of Konqueror 4.2, Webkit with the most recent versions of Safari 3.1 and Google Chrome 1.0, Presto with the most recent version of Opera 9, Lynx and Jaws 9; wider test coverage is usually carried out as well, paying attention to some minority browsers, where these have good reason to still exist, and some older versions of the main ones. And as I have said, I have observed no problem. Please correct this irritating fault as soon as possible. Best regards, Paul McKeown.
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 17:30:11 UTC