- From: Robert Mullaney <robert@easybusinessservices.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:25:08 -0500
- To: "'David Dorward'" <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Cc: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
A 2-sided argument is pointless. I would not have posted this if I knew only 1 person would get involved in the discussion. Doesn't anybody else have an opinion on this? Obviously we know my point of view and David's. I find it impossible to believe nobody else has anything to say. Thanks, Robert Mullaney Easy Business Services Phone: 239-242-6691 x 22 -----Original Message----- From: David Dorward,,, [mailto:david@us-lot.org] On Behalf Of David Dorward Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 10:24 AM To: Robert Mullaney Cc: www-validator-css@w3.org Subject: Re: background-color not validating when it should On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:14:28AM -0500, Robert Mullaney wrote: > Regardless of value (provided it is valid), the code is correct per the CSS > specifications therefore a warning should not be issued. By that logic, no warning should ever be issued for anything. Warnings are not errors. The validator can produce errors and still produce the "Your code is valid" message. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:26:05 UTC