Re: Proposed changes in warning handling in the CSS validator from Philip TAYLOR on 2006-12-13 (www-validator-css@w3.org from December 2006)

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:23:57 +0000
To: "Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com>
CC: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>, CSS validator list <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4580453D.3000502@Rhul.Ac.Uk>

OK, let me take this idea one step further :

Suppose the validator (/qua/ validator) were
to return three possible results :

Page valid.
Page valid but one or more questionable usages.
Page invalid.

In cases (1) and (3), that is basically all the
user needs to be told (modulo a list of errors
for (3)); but for (2), he/she could be told

	"Your page validates successfully but there
	 are some questionable usages; [HYPERLINK]
	 re-validate with warnings enabled.[/]."

Philip Taylor

Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2006 18:24:25 UTC