- From: rekkab <rekkabparts@freeler.nl>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:42:53 +0200
- To: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 24 September 2005 14:11:58 UTC
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<title>12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 </title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<style type="text/css">
.x{font-family: Verdana, Arial, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif;}
.y{font-size:1em;}
.x{color:#ff0000;}
.y{background:#ffff00;}
.x{margin:0em;}
.y{padding:0;}
.x{text-align:left;}
</style>
<script type="text/javascript">
</script>
</head>
<body>
<p class="x y">12345</p>
</body>
</html>
I? and they can't really argument use valid html css, when you have long lists of warnings , nothing worse than Police with dirty Underwear
Received on Saturday, 24 September 2005 14:11:58 UTC