- From: rekkab <rekkabparts@freeler.nl>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:42:53 +0200
- To: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 24 September 2005 14:11:58 UTC
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <title>12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 </title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /> <style type="text/css"> .x{font-family: Verdana, Arial, Geneva, Helvetica, sans-serif;} .y{font-size:1em;} .x{color:#ff0000;} .y{background:#ffff00;} .x{margin:0em;} .y{padding:0;} .x{text-align:left;} </style> <script type="text/javascript"> </script> </head> <body> <p class="x y">12345</p> </body> </html> I? and they can't really argument use valid html css, when you have long lists of warnings , nothing worse than Police with dirty Underwear
Received on Saturday, 24 September 2005 14:11:58 UTC