- From: <webmaster@eschultheiss.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:32:13 -0400
- To: www-validator-css@w3.org
I've read some of the archived messages on the W3 website and read your opinion of transparent background (probably main reason why the CSS Validator now has transparent backgrounds show as as "warnings"). A background-color of transparent ensures that whatever is behind an element is visible, rather than obscured by the background of the element. This is particularly useful with positioned elements, which might overlap two or more elements. Laying and floating are main reasons why CSS was created in the first place (besides the obvious reason of making it easier for web devolpers). Giving a "warning" to a transparent background is wrong. I've also read what you think about the difference between "warnings" and "errors", but understand from a devolpers point of view that no one wants to see ANY type of negitive message when validating their CSS. Even a mere warning can give the impression that someone doesn't know what he/she is doing, even if he/she is a skilled web devolper that mastered CSS. I strongly suggest you re-add transparent backgrounds to your list of things the CSS Validator view as "acceptable" and now output warnings on them. People need to be able to give *some* elements transparent background, and they don't want to get a warning in doing so. Please consider this.
Received on Friday, 23 September 2005 06:25:14 UTC