- From: Burtin Hart <beh@atac.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:01:30 -0700
- To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
My point is that it is not identified as "just" a note and therefore implies it is feedback from the CSS validator that your HTML *is* invalid. Burtin -----Original Message----- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 11:48 AM To: Burtin Hart Cc: www-validator-css@w3.org Subject: Re: Comment/question about HTML validator response... * Burtin Hart wrote: >Obviously the statement needs to be amended to inform the reader that >it is merely a note about what's a "best practice." It's not a best practise, it's a note that if you use invalid HTML your style sheet is much less likely to work correctly. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 19:01:51 UTC