- From: Burtin Hart <beh@atac.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:10:23 -0700
- To: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
- Cc: <site-comments@w3.org>, "'Ian B. Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <003701c5ba18$5c384460$a755b240@atac.com>
Hello: I used both the CSS and HTML validators recently, and I have a question about the wording and meaning of an apparently "boilerplate" statement that the CSS validator issues. My CSSs tested without errors or warnings, but I am wondering about the statement that the CSS validator displayed every time: No error or warning found To work as intended, your CSS style sheet needs a correct document parse tree. This means you should use valid HTML. I also tested my HTML and got no errors or warnings (image attached). Can you please clarify what the CSS statement means? Thank you. Burtin Hart -----Original Message----- From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:58 AM To: Burtin Hart Cc: site-comments@w3.org Subject: RE: RE: Comment/question about HTML validator response... On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 09:33 -0700, Burtin Hart wrote: > Hello, Ian. > > I have attached a screen shot of what I see when I test the HTML. > According to the validator, it is valid. The statement I am asking > about does not come from the HTML validator, it comes from the CSS > validator. > > When I test the CSS, I get no errors or warnings. I just want to know > what the CSS validator means by: > > > No error or warning found > > To work as intended, your CSS style sheet needs a correct document > > parse tree. This means you should use valid HTML. > > If there are no errors or warnings in the CSS, and the HTML validates > without errors or warnings, why is the CSS validator commenting on the > already-validated HTML? I suspect that the answer is that it's a reminder. But I agree that if it's a reminder in that particular context, it's confusing. If you don't mind, would you send your question to the CSS validator mailing list? www-validator-css@w3.org Thank you, -Ian > Thanks. > > Burtin > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:58 AM > To: Burtin Hart > Cc: site-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: RE: Comment/question about HTML validator response... > > > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:49 +0000, Burtin Hart wrote: > > Hello: > > > > I am asking this question again, as I have not yet received a > > response > > to it. > > Hi Burtin, > > My guess would be that your document is invalid. What does the HTML > validator say exactly? > > _ Ian > > > Thank you. > > > > Burtin Hart > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Burtin Hart [mailto:beh@atac.com] > > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:15 PM > > To: 'site-comments@w3.org' > > Subject: Comment/question about HTML validator response... > > > > Hello: > > > > I used both the CSS and HTML validators today, and I have a question > > about the wording and meaning of an apparently "boilerplate" statement > > that the CSS validator issues. My CSSs tested without errors or > > warnings, but I am wondering about the statement that was displayed > > every time: > > > > No error or warning found > > To work as intended, your CSS style sheet needs a correct document > > parse tree. This means you should use valid HTML. > > > > I also tested my HTML and got no errors or warnings. Can you please > > clarify what the statement means? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Burtin Hart > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: HTML-valid.gif
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 17:16:22 UTC