- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:35:31 +0000 (UTC)
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Cc: "[BTK]-denbuzze" <vueringschristian@gmail.com>, www-validator-css@w3.org
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, David Dorward wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:53:30PM +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > Which I didn't mention since it is not yet a recommendation > > > > It's in CR. > > > > You didn't say "IE doesn't provide a standard way of doing it", you said > > "CSS doesn't currently provide a way to implement opacity". > > So its the philosophical question of "Is CSS the CSS recomendations? > Or do CRs count too? Or working drafts? etc etc". It's not a philosophical question -- CR is defined to be the stage at which specifications are ready to be implemented. CRs today are equivalent to what RECs were before CRs were introduced (e.g. back when CSS2 and HTML4 went to REC). See the W3C process document for more details. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2005 13:35:34 UTC