- From: Kleinberger, Daniel <DKleinberger@WMitchell.edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:44:05 -0600
- To: "BIZLAW" <bizlaw@list.law.umaryland.edu>
This seems to me a very interesting intermediate position. The presence of the loyalty breach does not raise the duty of care standard generally. Instead the loyalty breach (besides stripping away the protective presumptions of the BJR) calls into question the quality of the board's decision making process -- was that process inadequate because tainted by improper influences. Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger William Mitchell College of Law 875 Summit Avenue St. Paul, MN 55105 voice: 651/290-6387 fax: 651/290-6414 dkleinberger@wmitchell.edu -----Original Message----- From: Baker, John [mailto:JMB@STRADLEY.COM] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 4:22 PM To: BIZLAW Subject: RE: fiduciary duty, entire fairness and opportunity cost The problem is that the firm, which can take on only a limited amount of leverage and therefore has to select between desirable transactions, is forgoing the more desirable transaction in order to benefit an insider. When the question is presented on those terms, I don't think the insider can win. The corporate fiduciaries have obviously violated their fiduciary duty, whether or not an entire fairness standard is applied. As Richard Booth points out, the plaintiff likely has difficult issues of proof in showing that the insider transaction, though still a profitable transaction, was clearly less valuable to the firm but was nonetheless chosen to benefit an insider. If the plaintiff can make that showing, though, the defendant is going to be in a bad way. John Baker --- You are currently subscribed to bizlaw as: DKleinberger@wmitchell.edu To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-bizlaw-24436J@list.law.umaryland.edu _______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses. _______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses. --- You are currently subscribed to bizlaw as: www-validator-css@w3.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-bizlaw-24436J@list.law.umaryland.edu
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 21:42:46 UTC