- From: Michael S. Bradley, Jr. <mike.bradley.jr@projexsys.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:24:59 -0400
- To: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I truly appreciate any advice or insight you might offer and understand that your time is surely limited in that regard. I would have posted this question to the appropriate w3c list, but the one associated with the css validator appears to be filled with spam, but that may be a misunderstanding on my part. My first attempt at proper XHTML and stylesheet implementation ... http://www.unrealsystems.com/ The stylesheet for the root directory's default (and only) document is linked and you can view it directly in a browser ... http://www.unrealsystems.com/css/unrealsystems.css Now, if you submit the same URI to the validator the following error is returned: "Target: http://www.unrealsystems.com/css/unrealsystems.css I/O Error: Can't process the object http://www.unrealsystems.com/css/unrealsystems.css " When you view the style sheet directly in the browser or "see it implemented" on the default document, your browser is actually receiving content that has been parsed by a ColdFusion application server ( http://www.allaire.com ). If I tell the application server NOT to parse ".css" files then the error is not encountered. By the way, having the application server parse the file beforehand is nice because it means I can perform extensive customization to various portions of my web site via a single style sheet that is generated on the fly as opposed to using multiple style sheets that are linked according to what portion of the site is being viewed. For the life of me I don't know why the validator would care or even know it was dealing with a dynamically generated file, my only guess being that the validator does not like CGI interfaces. Can you shed any light on this? I realize there are other possible ways to use the validator, but in the future when I'm applying CSS and XHTML throughout my other (much much more extensive) websites, direct validation through URIs would be a major advantage considering the stylesheets in question will be dynamically generated. Thanks for your help and the invaluable services the W3C provides to the world at large. Best regards, Mike Bradley, Jr. CTO and Co-founder projeXsys, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBO0RcmEbp+ZefHGx3EQJm0gCgt8rWcAxAeefTqTs7P9KEVPA0LLcAn0BV 5DoGLnKnFBzlCUKH9v7O8fE/ =ppnV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 08:30:40 UTC