- From: Craig A. Finseth <fin@finseth.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:17:38 -0600 (CST)
- To: jeff.sussna@quokka.com
- Cc: hardie@equinix.com, www-tv@w3.org
Good point. Some advertisers will want to purchase "The X Files", while others will want to purchase "3 AM on Sunday night". I would disagree with your characterizing of advertisers as a "tiny" market, though. Perhaps tiny in numbers relative to consumers browsing EPG's, but certainly not in terms of weight, power, or importance. ...and the URI scheme can handle this case quite well. Craig Jeff -----Original Message----- From: hardie@equinix.com [mailto:hardie@equinix.com] Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 1:51 PM To: jeff.sussna@quokka.com Cc: hardie@equinix.com Subject: Re: TV Broadcast URI Schemes Requirements > So far as I know, there is no one in the country who cares about > watching Channel 2/Sunday/9:00pm. However, lots of people want to > watch the X-Files. What people want identified is the content, not > the time slot. A minor nit: Advertisers, who provide ancillary content, may purchase time in this fashion. They commonly do so in order to "blanket" a series of channels with the same advertisement at the same time. They also commonly want to check that the advertisement did, in fact, occur at the stated time. A tiny market, I grant you, but one that cares a *lot*. (Private response, but feel free to discuss on the public list) regards, Ted Hardie
Received on Monday, 29 November 1999 17:17:40 UTC