- From: Michael A. Dolan <miked@tbt.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:22:41 -0800
- To: fin@finseth.com
- Cc: www-tv@w3.org
Craig- The use of any syntax in the application scenarios, such as "tv:", was specifically NOT meant to be a proposed syntax, but an example for clarification only. And, the document explicitly says this. Hence "tv:" (or anything else) is not proposed as a syntax anywhere that I can find. What I am proposing is that the exact syntax I mentioned be added to the requirements. As I mentioned, it may not be appropriate to add this to the application scenarios, and can be put into the requirements document if folks feel that is more appropriate. Regards, Mike At 10:56 AM 1/11/99 -0600, Craig A. Finseth wrote: > I think we should add to the application scenario list (or requirements, > whichever is more appropriate) the existing commercial practice for "tv" > URI's in existing (NTSC) broadcast systems. This list may not be complete, > but the ones I know about are: > >These are already in the applications list. > > tv: [reference to the currently tuned channel] >Item #1. > > tv:<channel_number> tv:7 >Item #3. > > tv:<network_name> tv:abc >Item #4. > >As this document lists the applications and not UR* syntaxes, I did >not attempt to catalog all the existing variants. > > ... > >Craig > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael A. Dolan, Representing DIRECTV, (619)445-9070 FAX: (619)445-6122 PO Box 1673 Alpine, CA 91903, Overnight: 20239 Japatul Rd, Alpine, CA 91901
Received on Monday, 11 January 1999 13:36:04 UTC