- From: Henning Timcke <henning.timcke@werft22.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 20:02:40 +0200
- To: "'Rob Glidden'" <robg@quadramix.com>, Simon Gibbs <simon@arch.sel.sony.com>
- Cc: "www-tv@w3.org" <www-tv@w3.org>, Philipp Hoschka <Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr>, Rodger Lea <rodger@arch.sel.sony.com>
Rob: I will try Where do I find information about data carousels ? Henning -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Rob Glidden [SMTP:robg@quadramix.com] Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 1998 19:25 An: Henning Timcke; Simon Gibbs Cc: www-tv@w3.org; Philipp Hoschka; Rodger Lea Betreff: Re: AW: work on url for television started Henning: Yes, I think assistance would be helpful. Could you elaborate a little on how XML could meet these kinds of requirements? 1) "referencing cache data" -- in transient caches and data carousels 2) "querying caches" -- to determine what is currently in them and available 3) "supporting session management" -- i.e. identifying, launching, subscribing, terminating multiple streaming sessions. I think a key challenge if finding the right level of abstraction -- some people think of all this a high-level, authoring issue, some think of it as low level exposing of the syntax of things like MPEG transport streams. Rob -----Original Message----- From: Henning Timcke <henning.timcke@werft22.com> To: Simon Gibbs <simon@arch.sel.sony.com> Cc: www-tv@w3.org <www-tv@w3.org>; Philipp Hoschka <Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr>; Rodger Lea <rodger@arch.sel.sony.com>; 'Rob Glidden' <robg@quadramix.com> Date: Tuesday, October 20, 1998 1:54 PM Subject: AW: AW: work on url for television started >Hi Simon >As far as I can see: your requirements can be met with XML. >Please let me know if we can be of assistance in working this out. >Henning > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Rob Glidden [SMTP:robg@quadramix.com] >Gesendet am: Montag, 19. Oktober 1998 03:37 >An: Simon Gibbs; Henning Timcke >Cc: www-tv@w3.org; Philipp Hoschka; Rodger Lea >Betreff: Re: AW: work on url for television started > >Throwing in a generic look at URIs, namespaces, and "looking into" a >resource to see what it contains: > >"Namespaces in XML" World Wide Web Consortium Working Draft >16-September-1998 > >at >http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-names > >This is a proposed general solution to using URIs in namespaces, which could >be a way to "point into" resources. > >This "pointing into"/namespace could be a "channel space", stream, or data >cache. This may be a more flexible tool than URIs alone (particularly if >you assume that the resource pointed into could contain structured data >itself, say an XML data structure). > >Rather than hardwire all possible resources, available >sessions/sessions/stream/cache resources may need to be queryable, and the >namespace identifier may need to be separable from the authored content. > >Such an approach may offer greater flexibility, authorability, and resource >abstraction. > >Rob > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Simon Gibbs <simon@arch.sel.sony.com> >To: Henning Timcke <henning.timcke@werft22.com> >Cc: www-tv@w3.org <www-tv@w3.org>; Philipp Hoschka ><Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr>; Rodger Lea <rodger@arch.sel.sony.com> >Date: Friday, October 16, 1998 2:06 PM >Subject: Re: AW: work on url for television started > > >>Henning Timcke wrote: >> >>> Sorry >>> This problem is already solved with UR*. >>> There is no difference between a local device and broadcast device. >> >>Well - there's alot of difference between a local device anda broadcast >device. For one, broadcast devices deliver ATSC >>or DVB >>or DSS ... MPEG-2 transport streams (not worrying about analog >>for the moment). Local devices may or may not - depends what >>type of device we're dealing with. Another difference, broadcast >>transport streams have unique names based on things like >>network ids and service ids - this does not simply carry over >>for in-home content. >> >>> It is no problem to give every device an IP. >> >>Are you saying it's no problem to give my camcorder, DVD playeretc an IP >address? It may be no problem imagining that >>every >>device in the house has an IP address - but this is different >>from reality: many existing home-networkable AV products >>are not IP-based, and many CE companies are working >>on non-IP architectures for home networking. >> >>Simon >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 1998 14:04:56 UTC