Re: [ttf] working group yet?

Looks good, but I see one inconsistency:  the duration of the working group is from 2002-2004, but the recommendation will be published in 2003.  Do you mean it will be published in 2004?

I can commit to full participation.  

Geoff/NCAM 



On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> just checking in-- any word from the W3C on whether timed text will
>> be granted working group status soon?
>
>I've been working on a TTWG draft charter recently, available at
>  http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/ttcharter20020306.html
>
>
>It's not completed yet but I encourage all the participants on this
>list to review the deliverables and scope section in details, as well
>as the participation commitment.
>
>This is non-binding yet, this is only a draft for review of what a
>charter for such a WG would look like.
>
>More importantly, we (W3C and this group) need to decide in which
>domain/activity of W3C (e.g. WAI, AudioVideo, HTML) this WG belong, or
>if we need to create of a new activity and get W3C membership formal
>approval, and of course what W3C resources are available to drive it
>(very scarce nowadays..).
>
>It'd be good to start with to get an idea of how many W3C members and
>other invited experts on this list would _commit_ to participating in
>this work, and also who would be willing to chair such a group
>(co-chairing is possible).
>
>Once I have more information regarding these questions, I will take
>the action to talk to W3C management (domain leaders, director) to see 
>where we go from there.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 11:47:46 UTC