- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 09:30:56 -0700
- To: sh@defuze.org
- Cc: www-talk@w3.org
Hi Sylvian, There are... rumblings. It would probably be best to ask this on the HTTP mailing list; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/ On 2006/05/09, at 7:33 AM, Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The W3 protocols page states: > > """Now that both HTTP extensions and HTTP/1.1 are stable > specifications, > W3C has closed the HTTP Activity. The Activity has achieved its > goals of > creating a successful standard that addresses the weaknesses of > earlier > HTTP versions.""" > > My question is then simple? Is there any plan to update HTTP after > almost > 6 years its last specification has been issued? > > As naive as it may sound, the last few years have shown that HTTP > was not > alsways either understood or clear enough on some topics. To name a > few: > > * The lack of clear separation between an HTTP status code and the > header > sent along the response > * The endless issue about the idempotency or not of HTTP methods > * The real usability of pipelinig (today's networks are not onmes > of 10 > years ago) > * The usability of 100-Continue > * Is the Accept header efficient > > I believe there are more issues of course. > > Now some might say these are minor problems and do not require a > new WG > process and this is certainly true (I'm a simple hacker with little > knowledge of how the W3 internally works). However I felt intrigued to > know if there were even "corridor discussions" on that matter :) > > Intrigued because HTTP has been becoming more and more heavily used > (internet connections are getting cheaper, globalization of > companies with > offices all around the World, the recent success of REST and > technologies > such as Ajax) and it sounds like a good time to me clarify blurry > topics. > > Anyway, just to know if there was any life around HTTP these days. > > Regards, > - Sylvain > http://www.defuze.org > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 16:31:05 UTC