- From: Mike Dierken <mdierken@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 21:30:59 -0700
- To: "Tim.Greenwald" <tim.greenwald@wamu.net>, "Www-Talk" <www-talk@w3.org>
Is pipelining the same as 'keep-alive'? I thought it was something different... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim.Greenwald" <tim.greenwald@wamu.net> To: "Www-Talk" <www-talk@w3.org> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:47 AM Subject: HTTP 1.1 Pipelining > > I would be interested in comments regarding the trade-off of using > pipelining. My thoughts on this are that it is great because it relieves the > burden on the server of having to open a TCP connection for each request for > an object but the trade-off is that the requests have to be sent/received in > order. This seems to me to override the benefits of multi-threading. If I > was to send multiple GETs at the same time I would open multiple connections > but the requests could be processed concurrently. > > Regards, > Tim Greenwald > Washington Mutual AQM Team > > "You can't manage what your not measuring" > > >
Received on Saturday, 2 August 2003 00:31:03 UTC