W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > July to August 2003

Re: HTTP 1.1 Pipelining

From: Mike Dierken <mdierken@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 21:30:59 -0700
To: "Tim.Greenwald" <tim.greenwald@wamu.net>, "Www-Talk" <www-talk@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Law11-OE38JJQ873Tlm0000f031@hotmail.com>

Is pipelining the same as 'keep-alive'?
I thought it was something different...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim.Greenwald" <tim.greenwald@wamu.net>
To: "Www-Talk" <www-talk@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: HTTP 1.1 Pipelining

> I would be interested in comments regarding the trade-off of using
> pipelining. My thoughts on this are that it is great because it relieves
> burden on the server of having to open a TCP connection for each request
> an object but the trade-off is that the requests have to be sent/received
> order. This seems to me to override the benefits of multi-threading. If I
> was to send multiple GETs at the same time I would open multiple
> but the requests could be processed concurrently.
> Regards,
> Tim Greenwald
> Washington Mutual AQM Team
> "You can't manage what your not measuring"
Received on Saturday, 2 August 2003 00:31:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 20 January 2020 16:08:27 UTC