- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:37:30 -0700
- To: <www-talk@w3.org>
Just thinking out loud; There are a number of situations where it would be good to explicitly mark a representation of a resource as immutable; that is, state that it will not vary over time. For example, it would be nice to have an explicit way to let schema processors know that they should download a representation into their cache and use it from now on. Or, that a manually downloaded and installed schema is effectively good forever. Although this can (and ultimately should) be done in a framework like RDF, HTTP seems like a more reasonable place to start; there are efforts underway to bridge HTTP metadata to RDF anyway. I'm thinking something like a Cache-Control directive; Cache-Control: time-immutable It can be argued that the caching model in HTTP/1.1 allows UAs to do this already (i.e., either give the representation an extremely long freshness lifetime, or use stale representations with a warning), but this subtlety seems to pass most implementors by. An explicit directive is easy to understand and apply. Thoughts? It might also be interesting to think about hinting in the response that other variants are available for a particular resource (without using content negotiation) or stating that no other variants (along various axes besides time) are available, but that can wait. -- Mark Nottingham
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2002 17:38:51 UTC