- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:15:16 +0300
- To: ext Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- CC: www talk <www-talk@w3.org>
On 2002-05-29 15:05, "ext Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: > .. (e.g. I have a > convention in my web space that http://id.ninebynine.org/ is used for such > abstract identifiers. I think it helps to clarify the intent, but it > doesn't make all the problems go away, such as my second question above.) Tut, tut, Graham ;-) How is this any different from voc://ninebynine.org/... except that the convention is not standardized and the semantics that the URI denotes an abstract resource is specific/proprietary to your own practices? This seems to conflict with your earlier expressed opinion that the URI should not reflect itself whether the resource is or is not "on the web" Eh? Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 02:12:00 UTC