Re: TAG and WWW Architecture

St.Laurent Simon <> wrote:

>> Folks, please, let's not turn this into a bash-the-W3C session -- they get
>> enough of that already. Instead, let's try and keep on-topic with
>> constructive solutions about how the W3C can improve their openness, without
>> sacrificing too much.
> Sorry Aaron, but if trust in the W3C is the fundamental issue at stake
> here, openness is really only one aspect of the discussion.

OK, but still, I think it would be more productive to come up with
suggestions that reduce the need for "blind trust" or simply faith in the
W3C to "do the right thing". I think openness is one of these ways.

[ Aaron Swartz | | ]

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 15:33:09 UTC