- From: Robert Miner <RobertM@dessci.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 09:39:08 -0500
- To: ian@hixie.ch
- CC: RobertM@dessci.com, aswartz@swartzfam.com, hammond@csc.albany.edu, mozilla-mathml@mozilla.org, www-talk@w3.org
Ian, Our recent dialog has run: ian> Would you also like PNGs incorrectly identified with the MIME ian> type text/html due to circumstances beyond the authors control to ian> be sent to PNG decoders? robert> Is this a trick question, perhaps? I think I would, wouldn't robert> I? At least it seems like I would be happier just having the robert> image appear properly, than having it interpreted as horribly robert> garbled HTML. What's the catch? ian> Should we throw away the whole basis of MIME types and the HTTP ian> Content-Type header, and just use content sniffing instead? This leaves me wondering if you are debating in good faith. If you are just marking time defending a decision that is already carved in stone, just say so and let's quit wasting time. I have a bunch of new documentation to write explaining to our customers all the extra work they will have to do if they want to try to accomodate readers using Mozilla. If not, you need to give me some sign that you actually understand the issues at stake. From what you write, you give the clear impression that you don't think either of the following issues are important: 1) For some time to come, most web authors will be preparing content that will be read predominantly with older user agents, and therefore need to send documents as text/html. 2) For some time to come, many web authors will end up sending XHTML as text/html due to circumstances beyond their control, even if they are willing to send it as text/xml. If you don't acknowledge those points, there is nothing to talk about. Good luck popularizing your software. You've got your work cut out for you. If you do acknowledge those points, then you don't need me to point out why your analogy with PNGs is not very relevant. --Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------ Robert Miner RobertM@dessci.com MathML 2.0 Specification Co-editor 651-223-2883 Design Science, Inc. "How Science Communicates" www.dessci.com ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 10:39:22 UTC