- From: Joris Dobbelsteen <joris.dobbelsteen@mail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 22:50:51 +0200
- To: "WWW WG (E-mail)" <www-talk@w3.org>
Now we shouldn't have RAW WAV for it, but rather a good speech technology. It must also be usable for people with slow links (40Kbps). Wave becomes extremely large if you have enough words.... Remembering the times of Windows 3.1 (6 years ago) Creative Labs has software that spoke words, you simply has a word and a 'speech word', with the sounds. This made it easy to speak a word without knowing it actually. Who-ever some words need special pronouncements, so this must be downloaded and that is relative small. Dictionaries are not that simple, but what I think about is offline usage, and your system can work only if you are online..... Maybe suggestions to improve for both???? Joris Dobbelsteen -----Original Message----- From: www-talk-request@w3.org [mailto:www-talk-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of James P. Salsman Sent: dinsdag 4 juli 2000 1:29 To: www-talk@w3.org Cc: joris.dobbelsteen@mail.com Subject: RE: Jumbotext - A New Feature to WWW >... Now since not everybody has a Speech system ... More and more languages have talking dictionaries on the web all the time. English has at least a few, for example: http://dictionary.msn.com/find/entry.asp?search=pronounce There you can get a RIFF (.wav) and AIFF audio clip of most words. The trick is providing a useful way to add the selection (which can be obtained differently on different browsers -- see: http://www.webreference.com/js/column12/crossbrowser.html -- for a working form/script example) URL-encoded at the end of your favorite dictionary GET-method URL stub like the one above. This should be easy, but if you open a new window, then you need a way to refer to the window that you are studying from, because each window can have its own selection. That method would save only a few copy-and-paste operations into the dictionary's own form, but when browsing unfamiliar languages, easy access to a dictionary can make a lot of difference. Does anyone have a way to refer to the most recent selection from a different window in J/ECMA/JavaScript? I have a feeling that it is probably possibly on each platform, but in different ways, like obtaining the selection to begin with. Cheers, James -- http://www.bovik.org
Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2000 16:49:43 UTC