- From: Dudley Mills <dudmills@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 18:43:32 +1100
- To: Albert Lunde <albert-lunde@nwu.edu>
- CC: www-talk@w3.org
Hi Albert, Thanks for this. I have one or two hurdles over which I might stumble first but I have no problems with offering "non-exclusive licenses under reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions". I think it is much too early to say at this time exactly what would be reasonable. Kind regards, Dudley Mills, 30 Hutchison Crescent, Kambah, ACT 2902, Australia. phone/fax: +61-2-6296-2639 email: dudmills@ozemail.com.au web: http://www.ozemail.com.au/~dudmills/ Albert Lunde <albert-lunde@nwu.edu> wrote: > > > Actually, any one serious about using my patent would probably want to > > know in advance what a license would cost. By publishing but my > > provisional patent and my full spec before the patent was granted, I > > have given notice of the presence of the the possibility of their being > > Intellectual Property in this area. I am not trying to bait and switch. > > > > Intellectual Property in the 'net area is not limited to software. What > > danger does the presence of Intellectual Property present to the 'net > > industry? > > Well if you are trying to make something a standard, you may have > offer some assurances about licensing terms. > > You might want to take a look at the IETF's page on intellectual > property notices at: > > http://www.ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ipr.html > > Now this is the IETF, not the W3C, but it's a pretty good representation > of the ideas of people deep in Internet standards. > > More informally, the prior history of things like .ARC and .ZIP > or the GIF patent issue, indicate there's a lot of people on the net > who will keep even further away from propritary technologies. > > The client side of the Internet, and much of the server side, > is still founded on free or cheap software. > > It's like the comment that "The Internet treats censorship as damage > and routes around it". If you try to assert rights on things that > people think aren't valid, or that are over-priced, people will > find other ways to do it.
Received on Monday, 23 February 1998 02:41:22 UTC