- From: Tony Sanders <sanders@earth.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 13:23:16 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-talk@w3.org
> Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> wrote: > You would be able to use a search engine to search, for example, for the > web pages: > 1. having the classification "motor vehicle repairers", > 2. having a service location within a specific geographic area, > 3. nominating a particular brand name (eg of motor vehicle), > 4. having particular keywords etc. First, there is prior art in your patent area -- we did this a long time ago when the web first started getting popular. But content providers haven't been willing to provide such information for whatever reasons. And in any case, creating a new <CCG> tag is unnecessary, you can do everything you suggest (and more) using combinations of <META>, <LINK>, and <A> link relationships. <RANT> Why won't IE and Netscape implement link relationships! There are *SO* many amazing things you could do with them if they would just get off their ass. Ah well, when the netscape sources come out you know what part I will be hacking on :) </RANT> If you want to compete with the Yellow Pages then you will have hire... > An army of people are required just to gather the data for basic > one line entries in the yellow pages. Another army is employed > selling, producing and publishing display advertisements. A battalion > is employed in delivering and recycling the books. > am trying to provide improvements in web searching technology which > businesses will find valuable enough to license. So I would have license the use of the <CCG> tag from you. Good luck, NOBODY will ever go for that, that is a ludicrous concept on the face of it -- I will just use the <META> tag, thank you very much.
Received on Thursday, 19 February 1998 13:50:25 UTC