- From: Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor <roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 16:35:55 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-talk@w3.org
From draft-fielding-uri-syntax-01 Appendix C.2 All client applications remove the query component from the base URI before resolving relative URIs. However, some applications fail to separate the reference's query and/or fragment components from a relative path before merging it with the base path. This error is rarely noticed, since typical usage of a fragment never includes the hierarchy ("/") character, and the query component is not normally used within relative references. g?y/./x = http://a/b/c/g?y/x g?y/../x = http://a/b/c/x g#s/./x = http://a/b/c/g#s/./x g#s/../x = http://a/b/c/g#s/../x These first two examples really confuses me. I though the URI is divided up into components: <first>/<second>;<third>?<fourth> o g?u/../x is divided up into the path component g and the query component u/../x. I though the .. and . were only applied as a special case to the path component. in this case since the .. (.) are in the query component, I'd expect the to resolve to http://a/b/c/g?y/../x (and http://a/b/c/g?y/./x). After reading over the suggested algorithm in section 5.2, I reach the same conclusion. Can someone explain these two abonormal examples? -- Russell O'Connor roconnor@uwaterloo.ca <URL:http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/%7Eroconnor/> "And truth irreversibly destroys the meaning of its own message" -- Anindita Dutta, "The Paradox of Truth, the Truth of Entropy"
Received on Sunday, 15 February 1998 16:36:16 UTC