- From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jan 1997 15:11:54 +0100 (MET)
- To: dwm@xpasc.com (David W. Morris)
- Cc: akosut@nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us, koen@win.tue.nl, dmk@research.bell-labs.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-talk@www10.w3.org, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
David W. Morris: > [...] >Another choice is to stop overloading a single value for two >purposes ... > 1. Declaring the servers capabilities > 2. Labeling the level of the response I see no such overloading in the HTTP/1.1 spec. The spec is clear on the fact that the minor version number in the response does 1 (but only for this particular request!), not 2. Now, there *might* be a good reason to add a header which does 2. A header which says `this response is compatible with both 1.0 clients and 1.1 clients' might be useful for a 1.1 caching proxy. We'll find out when someone actually starts trying to build such a proxy. >Dave Morris Koen.
Received on Wednesday, 1 January 1997 09:13:37 UTC