- From: Matthew James Marnell <marnellm@portia.portia.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 03:11:39 -0400
- To: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- Cc: holtrf@destinyusa.com (Russell Holt), www-html@w3.org, www-talk@w3.org
:>Securely transacting Java applets from and *to* servers and executing the :>applets on the server in a fully secured and sanitized environment. Sorry, I missed this in the first reading. Again, since nobody has asked this question, I will. Why are we talking about running Java applets on servers? Why did someone go through all that trouble to make a largely portable (and since Sun just cinched up the bag with it's 1.0.2 license, I don't think many other systems besides the ones that Sun supports will have a JDK or other Java platform that keeps up with the Spec) language? Why are we going to use Java instead of CGI if we're going to have to execute it back on our servers anyway? I'm afraid that something has gone awry, terribly awry here. You see, I can't think of any reason that anyone would be sending me anything to run on the servers. I can see someone downloading applets/apps that reference another service on my servers, such as an applet that uses the MsqlJava classes to talk to the mSQL daemon, etc. Since security is supposed to be built into Java in one of the upcoming releases, that's taken care of. So, what's the beef. I've seen MZ talk about sending Java applets/apps back and forth, but one it's there, has the class it needs to talk back, why send one back? Why send a whole big bloody applet back when you can use any number of protocols to talk back and forth. Edumicate me. Matt
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 1996 03:12:08 UTC