- From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <agulbra@troll.no>
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 14:32:12 +0100
- To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
- Cc: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>, www-talk@w3.org
On Wed 8 Nov 1995 15:09:46 -0800, Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Nov 1995, Shel Kaphan wrote: > > And by the way, I wasn't talking about course-grained, dynamic > > content-negotiation per se, but about the fine grained and constant > > properties of browsers such as "can-center-text", > > "tables-can-contain-forms", etc. > > Crucial design goal decision time, folks: > > Do we want to support, through mechanisms in HTTP, the ability to express > a bitmap of capabilities within specific content types (like HTML), or > not? In HTTP? For a browser to say, in its request, "the answer to this request will not tickle a bug in my support of forms inside tables" seems patently ridiculous. If a server wants that detailed browser information, it _must_ obtain the information from some source which can be updated as new bugs in a browser is discovered. (By browser I mean not only name but version and even compilation time.) --Arnt
Received on Thursday, 9 November 1995 10:17:59 UTC