- From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 15:38:46 -0800 (PST)
- To: William King <wpk@fc.net>
- Cc: www-talk@w3.org
On Wed, 8 Nov 1995, William King wrote: > I'm probably missing the point here but doesn't HotJava's approach to > dynamic content solve the content negotiation problem nicely? HotJava's model of plug-in renderers for new data types and plug-in handlers for new protocols is essential to many people's long-term visions as to how the web should evolve. When the code necessary to render, say, netscape HTML can be expressed as a program in Java, then I can slurp the code into my browser from somewhere when needed. At that point the name and make of the browser you are using becomes irrelevant to the content being served. You can even create your *own* data types and renderer (well, you can sorta do that now with SGML, but to too many people that's academic :). However, there is still going to be a need for expressing preferences (i.e., please don't show me PDF files), file size limits (i.e., I prefer fast loading pages with simple images to image-heavy pages that take forever to load), and preferred natural language. And even the plug-in architecture needs MIME types to describe the format the data is in. Hell, I might even ask that I'd rather get Python renderers over Java renderers. Or even different levels of Java... As long as the system has to support evolutionary practices and differences in capabilities or preferences, *some* form of negotiation is necessary, or we have built the Network of Babel. Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 1995 19:13:29 UTC