- From: Daniel DuBois <ddubois@rafiki.spyglass.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 10:14:15 -0600
- To: nazgul@utopia.com (Kee Hinckley)
- Cc: www-talk@www10.w3.org
>that this browser supports '<p align=center>' and that this browser >supports tables but not percentage widths, and this one supports tables >within tables but not with forms in them; I'm going to have to keep doing >browser-based presentation. Does anyone REALLY need that level of detail? Are you telling me you have 8 different parallel documents for each tabled page, one with forms and subtables and width, one with forms and subtables but no widths, one with forms but no subtables and no widths, etc?!? I can't beleive it. Just pick a relatively low-level, common, spec-compliant table format, and send it to everyone. People using Cello 1.0 will be screwed but so what. It's these da#& user-agent-negotiation people (YAHOO - THIS MEANS YOU) that are still sending me non-table versions even though Spyglass Mosaic 2.1 does tables very well thank you. Quite annoying. ----- Dan DuBois, Software Animal http://www.spyglass.com/~ddubois/ I absolutely do not speak for Spyglass.
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 1995 11:15:39 UTC