- From: Darren New <dnew@sgf.fv.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 16:39:15 +0100
- To: Lou Montulli <montulli@netscape.com>
- Cc: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www10.w3.org>
On Mon, 24 Apr 1995, Lou Montulli wrote: > The only sites that I have encountered that Netscape fails > on are ones that have broken PASV implementations. These > sites are in violation of the RFC so there isn't much > I can do about that. If you know of any sites that fail > please email me with the address. Well, some of our servers support it but the firewalls block attempts at incoming connections to arbitrary ports. I've never had a problem with the PORT command working, tho. Why do you use PASV instead of PORT? --Darren
Received on Monday, 24 April 1995 16:40:53 UTC