W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > March to April 1995

Re: Client-side highlighting; tag proposal

From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 1995 08:06:42 -0500
Message-Id: <199503111306.IAA11131@ebt-inc.ebt.com>
To: gfaber@teknowledge.com
Cc: www-talk@www10.w3.org
>That is, your search engine asks for content with word X returns the url of
>html page A which contains page A with all the X's surrounded by the highlight
>tag.  Then, another search request for content with word Y happens to return
>page A (coincidentally contains Y too), but here with all the Y's tagged.
>Same URL, different associated HTML.  This creates problems for profiling,
>expiration, other visited-page management facilities.
DynaWeb suffers from this, and in addition, it has named stylesheets
and whatnot, so there can be quite a large number of HTML "pages"
associated with any addressed element in the SGML document being
accessed. In addition, the auto-generated TOC's might be interesting
for Spiders...

>Of course, the construction of the URL being returned all depends on
>how you write your gateway...

True enough. DynaWeb has 3 subdocument addressing modes (read: URL
formats), and uses the ?foo=bar construct extensively... 

I should note that DynaWeb is a native HTTP server.
Received on Saturday, 11 March 1995 08:04:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 20 January 2020 16:08:16 UTC