- From: James Gwertzman <gwertzma@das.harvard.edu>
- Date: Sun, 5 Mar 1995 12:38:21 -0500
- To: rupesh@henna.iitd.ernet.in
- Cc: www-talk@www10.w3.org
I'm worried that in the discussions on interactive HTTP people haven't been sufficiently concerned with bandwidth or server load. I'm currently researching wide-area WWW caching schemes (more than just campus proxies or client caches) so I'm very attuned to issues that might affect this. Querying the server every n seconds is not only very inefficient, but even a mildly popular site would quickly become overloaded. Likewise, in the rush to add dynamic pages to the WWW I think we should not forget that caching information is one of the ways we're going to make sure that WWW growth does not overtake Internat capacity. Anytime you can handle interactivity by transferring a script to the client and having the script run on the browser is going to be a much better solution than always running the script on the server, and forcing the client to act as nothing more than a fancy dumb terminal. That way the script could be cached around the net, and the original server's load will not depend on how interactive the particular application is.
Received on Sunday, 5 March 1995 12:38:32 UTC