- From: <solman@mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 19:41:25 EDT
- To: miked@eolas.com (Mike Doyle)
- Cc: www-talk@w3.org
Mike said to Pei, |> We've had this discussion before (last September, remember?). You |> admitted then that you did NOT release or publish anything like this |> before the Eolas demonstrations. Mike, for your information and education, it is the date of _invention_ that relevant in the United States. The date of publication is only relevant if you filed more than one year latter (in which case the patent is also invalid). [Which is not to imply that there is not other prior art or that EOLAS has done anything sufficiently novel to be called an invention.] Jason W. Solinsky
Received on Monday, 21 August 1995 19:41:35 UTC